Global Journal of Engineering Sciences (GJES)
Stiffness
of Three-Phase Concentric Composite Solids
Authored by Victor Birman
Abstract
There
are numerous examples of three-phase concentric composites, including coated
fiber-reinforced materials and syntactic foams. The stiffness of such
three-phase materials is usually investigated by micromechanical methods
specified for this particular case. For example, Luo and Weng presented
solutions for three-phase concentric spheres [1] and for three-phase concentric
cylinders models [2] of an inclusion, a coating (“intermediate matrix”), and a
matrix using the Mori–Tanaka method. Among numerous studies of three-phase or
multi-phase composites one can mention [3-6].
The
present approach employs a combination of two-phase matrix-inclusion models to
determine the stiffness of a three-phase solid. The advantage of the proposed
method is its simplicity, i.e. a reduction of the three-phase composite
micromechanics to a superposition of available two-phase solutions, without a
need in additional analytical procedures. This method is also universal and can
be applied with any micromechanical theory available for two-phase composites.
Keywords: Composite materials; Micromechanics;
Coated fibers; Syntactic foams
Analysis
Consider
a composite with two-phase concentric inclusions uniformly distributed over the
volume (Figure 1). Our goal is to evaluate the stiffness of such three-phase
material given the engi neering constants of each phase. The solution is
obtained by the following superposition of two-phase composite models represented
in Figure 1 for spherical inclusions.
In eqn. (3), πΊ is the fourth order Eshelby’s tensor. In the
case of spherical inclusions, explicit formulas for engineering constants are
available.
Another example of
solutions employing eqn. (1) can also be obtained in the case where inclusions
are cylindrical and randomly oriented. The comprehensive solution can be
derived using the well-known Tsai-Pagano method based on the properties of a
unidirectional composite that are obtained by the Tsai-Halpin method. The
solution can also be obtained by the method of Christensen and Waals [8,9]. In
particular, a very simple solution is obtained if the inclusion volume fraction
is below 20%. While the Poisson ratio is adequately approximated by the rule of
mixtures, the modulus of elasticity of the material with 3-D randomly oriented
fibers is obtained by
where the subscript
“f” refers to the fibers, πΈ, πΈπ πππ πΈπ are the moduli of elasticity of the composite, fiber and
matrix, respectively, and ππ is the matrix Poisson ratio. Notably, the present equation does
not account for the fiber aspect ratio; accordingly, it may not be suitable for
short fibers where this ratio has a noticeable effect on the stiffness.
The examples of
micromechanical methods suitable for using with the proposed two-phase
superposition approach can be extended to any analytical theory, such as
self-consistent, Ponte Castaneda- Willis and Kuster-Toksoz methods, etc.
Numerical examples and a comparison with available solutions and experimental data
will be included in an extended article.
In conclusion, the present method enables to approach the analysis of the stiffness of three-phase and, with the necessary expansion, multi-phase concentric composite solids using available micromechanical methods for two-phase composites. Such approach can significantly simplify the analysis of relevant composite materials.
For
more about Iris Publishers
please click on: http://irispublishersgroup.com/submit-manuscript.php.
To read more about this article https://irispublishers.com/gjes/fulltext/stiffness-of-three-phase-concentric-composite-solids.ID.000640.php
Indexing List of Iris Publishers: https://medium.com/@irispublishers/what-is-the-indexing-list-of-iris-publishers-4ace353e4eee
Iris
publishers google scholar citations: https://scholar.google.co.in/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=irispublishers&btnG=

Comments
Post a Comment