Global Journal of Engineering Sciences (GJES)
Directions
Developing Quality Management Systems of Mechanical Engineering Enterprises
Authored by Vavilin Yaroslav
Abstract
The
article deals with the development of the quality management system in the
context of changing economic policy and increasing competition. The article
considers the main directions of developing integrated management systems in
organizations.
Keywords: Quality system; Mechanical
engineering; Integration
Introduction
In
conditions of high competition and limited resources (especially financial),
the issue of strategy for organizing machinebuilding production to reduce all
types of costs and to increase its efficiency, as well as search for
competitive advantages becomes relevant [1-5].
Discussion
Modern
realities of the struggle for the consumer and reduction of all types of costs
lead organizations to realize the need not only to create ISM, but also to expand
them by introducing various subsystems.
The
integrated quality management system is defined as a part of the general
management system that meets the requirements of two or more standards and
which functions as a whole. The introduction of such systems allows us to solve
a number of tasks to optimize document flow, in particular [2-5]:
•
appearing repetitive processes;
•
complexity of perceiving interrelations and system element subordination;
• high
labor input and resource requirements for independent implementation.
Another
area of product quality assurance is the introduction of a modern quality
philosophy. Among the most popular in recent years, we can distinguish lean
production methods (mapping the flow of value creation; pulling line production;
kanban; kaizen; 5S system; SMED system; TPM system; Just-In-Time system;
visualization). However, the simultaneous implementation of all these elements
may not lead to the desired result (“process paradox” - a large amount of
resources spent does not lead to a significant effect)
In
this regard, the issue of optimal choice of priority tools and methods for
managing the quality of products becomes relevant. The two criteria with a
ten-point rating scale are proposed to use: the importance of the element (1 –
low, 10 – high) and the payback period (1 – slow, 10 – fast). The final score
is obtained by multiplying and is described as follows: 1-16-negligibly level
of recommendation for the implementation; 17-32-low; 33-48-medium; 49 – 64 -
high; 65 – 100 – primary. The evaluation results of lean production elements
are shown in the table.
Conclusion
Applying this kind of ranking
assessment will allow a rational approach to the question of the sequence of
implementation of quality management elements and achieve a significant
reduction in the payback period for implementation.
For
more about Iris Publishers
please click on: http://irispublishersgroup.com/submit-manuscript.php.
To read more about this article - https://irispublishers.com/gjes/fulltext/directions-developing-quality-management-systems-of-mechanical-engineering-enterprises.ID.000644.php
Indexing List of Iris Publishers: https://medium.com/@irispublishers/what-is-the-indexing-list-of-iris-publishers-4ace353e4eee
Iris
publishers google scholar citations: https://scholar.google.co.in/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=irispublishers&btnG=

Comments
Post a Comment